Cuauhtémoc, Last Emperor of the Aztecs

Essay on Rap Music - 2280 Words

Rap is a popular type of music in todays society, but it didnt just come to be. In the 1970s rap emerged from other types of music to become what it is today. Rap is influenced and inspired by other types of music. Its influences are closely related to each other. Rap music has derived from various types of music. In a world in which people are constantly confronted with violent acts such as rape, assault, murder, school shootings and other violences, society is eager and anxious to find and remove all causes of these cultural ills. All the blame can not be put on one particular thing but a heavier degree of blame can be put on one thing. Some of the violent acts listed above are expressed through music. Gangster rap, which followed†¦show more content†¦Style and originality were important in writing. Graffiti writing wasnt just an act of fun. It was taken very seriously. By the late 1970s graffiti writing could be found on subway cars, trains, buildings and any other large objects that would allow it to be widely visible. Jamaican music and hip hop can be referred to as cousins. One style of Jamaican music is called toasting. At first Jamaican toasting began when DJs would toast over the music they played with simple slogans to encourage the dancers. Some of these simple slogans were Work it, Work it and Move it up (qtd in Rhodes). The term toast meant words or slogans that a DJ would say over the music to encourage dancers. These words spoken over music were related to words spoken over music in rap. Unlike these simple words and slogans that Jamaicans used, the words used over music in rap are more developed. Jamaican disc jockeys talked over the music they played. Music in Jamaica was played at blues dances. Blues dances took place in large halls or slum yards. As toasting popularity increased, so did the lengths of toasts. Shortly after toasting came dubbing. DJs that dubbed cut back and forth between vocal and instrumental tracks while adjusting bass and treble. Rap and toasting both rely on pre recorded sounds. You need a strong beat rapped and a strong beat toasted. Rap relies more on a hard funk strong beat while Jamaicans relied on beat from JamaicanShow MoreRelated Rap Music Is Not Music Essay1786 Words   |  8 PagesRap Music Is Not Music Describing the (disenchanting) chanting of â€Å"Rap Music† as singing or as music is indeed (in either case) a capital misnomer. Real Music is the careful arrangement of organized sounds in the form of notes that then result in a smooth blend of rhythm, tone, and pitch that when united, is quite pleasing to the ear. Rap is not music. The unpleasant-sounding horror is chaotic dissonance and certainly not elegant consonance. Rap is veritable noise pollution that is tastelesslyRead MoreEssay on Rap Music2073 Words   |  9 Pagesoutlet is the loud blaring music coddling his already pent-up rage, an escape from these harsh realities, seducing him to a life of violence. In him is created a â€Å"me against the world† mentality that is manifested in the rap and hip-hop music that dominates his culture. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Among the most common subjects of rap and hip-hop is violence and misogyny. They emphasize these two as inevitable regularities of the life lived in the streets. Their music reflects this fact by promotingRead MoreInside Rap Music Essay631 Words   |  3 PagesInside Rap Music Music, like mass media and television, has such a powerful influence on our society. People think rap music is very negative towards society, which is not the case. Rappers teach people about possible consequences a person may encounter if they choose the same route. Rappers tell their life experience through their songs. Rap music does not influence violence; it educates people on what is going on in the lives of urban people. When someone mentions rap music, the firstRead More Violence In Rap Music Essay2087 Words   |  9 Pages Boom, boom! Boom, boom! The kind of bass that drains batteries and the kind of lyrics that unload clips, these are the sounds that rap music produces. I chose this topic because I am extremely interested in rap music and I want to explore the violent aspect of the industry. I have never had a chance to look at the violent side of it and I plan to find answers to questions I have in my search. Tupac Shakur is one of my favorite artists and when he was shot and killed I really started to take noticeRead More Freedom of Expression and Rap Music Essay1113 Words   |  5 Pagesare protected under the First Amendment. Rap music should not be restricted on the television despite much controversy over the idea. Bok says that some acts cause debates, although people may disagree with it doesnt mean it should be taken away. There should be no restrictions held against playing of rap music. Music that we listen to constructs the sound track of our lives. The number one killer in creative speech is censorship. Censorship in music is a topic that has brought about much controversyRead MoreHip-hop and Rap Music Essay641 Words   |  3 PagesHip-hop and Rap Music Often times when people hear about Hip Hop/Rap music, theyll paint a picture in their heads of black men cussing, guns, marijuana, lots of gold, and girls looking like prostitutes. Parents and teachers put an image in their kids head that Rap music is bad, and they dont want their kids to be influenced by something that is negative. With the way Rap music is advertised in the US, I would have to agree with that looking at it from an average parents point ofRead More Music Essay - America Needs Rap and Hip Hop1366 Words   |  6 PagesAmerica Needs Rap and Hip Hop Ever since it became popular in the late eighties, hip-hop music has been a target of moral disapproval. Many critics have labeled the music as an offensive, vulgar, misogynist form of expression, which negatively influences its listeners, particularly children. Early in rap musics development concerned citizens and various government officials held protests against the release of certain rap albums. Rap musics opponents demanded strict censorship. ButRead MoreRap Music and the Sexualization of Women Essay2219 Words   |  9 Pagesdance floor in the backyard, the loud, unfamiliar music, and the disco lights. It did not take long for the party to get started. Boys and girls alike started to make their way to the makeshift dance floor, immediately dancing on one another. I was absolutely taken away as girls that I had known for four years bent over and began to press their backsides up against boys, grinding on the boys as if it were an everyday activity as degrading music b lared out of the speakers, as if they were not awareRead MoreNegative Effects of Rap Music Essay932 Words   |  4 Pages Is today â€Å"Gangster rap† and rappers corrupting society, introducing drugs and provoking violence? In the mid-1980s Gangster rap came to be depicting images of violence, guns, gangs, drugs, and sexism. By the 1990s rap music became a major part of the industry and topped the charts. As people began to want different things; different music was created and that contributed to the variety of music that we have today. This is one of the many things that makes AmericaRead MoreEssay about Rap Music and Teen Violence 944 Words   |  4 PagesMusic can be a reflection of our life experiences. Each genre of music invokes different emotions and reactions in its listeners. Rap has become a very popular genre of music. As its popularity has increased, some people have questioned whether it can trigger violence in teens. While some rap songs do have violent lyrics, there is no direct evidence that rap music provokes violence in teenagers. Rap music has African roots just like jazz, the blues and rock ‘n’ roll. African slaves sang songs

Comparison of International Relations Theory free essay sample

Contemporary international relations is a complex field. Understanding events and attempting to make sense of them can be a daunting task. There are, however, tools available, which can assist in providing clarity to these complex issues. The first of these tools is historic knowledge. Without historic background of an issue, it is nearly impossible to understand the events driving that issue in modern times. A second tool, the one which will be the focus of this paper, is international relations theory. Theory can be defined as â€Å"a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action,† (Merriam-Webster) and can be used â€Å"in many cases as a basis of prediction. † (Mingst 56) There are three major theories which we can use to analyze events: liberalism, realism, and constructivism. These theories provide us with different points of view from which to analyze issues in today’s world. By looking at events, both past and present, in the context of a given theory, we can begin to understand those events and the driving forces behind them, as well as to make predictions about future events. The first of these theories, liberalism, is based upon the belief that man is innately good and that social conditions can be improved, paving the way for progress. Liberalism has its roots in â€Å"Enlightenment optimism, nineteenth-century political and economic liberalism, and twentieth-century Wilsonian idealism. † (Mingst 60) Liberalism sees man as rational, and through rationalism, society flourishes. Liberalism views the state not as an individual on the international stage, but as a member of a larger international community. Liberalism argues that war is not a part of human nature, and that it is brought on by the corruption of institutions. As such, liberalism posits that war can be avoided through reformation of the corrupt institutions, and through mutual cooperation among nations, which is in the self-interest of each nation. â€Å"According to liberal thinking, the expansion of human freedom is best achieved in democracies and through market capitalism. † (Mingst 60) By way of free market and free trade, nations form dependencies upon one another, contributing to the deterrence of war. Liberals believe in international institutions as a means to mediate differences and ensure the avoidance of war. This is achieved through international laws, courts and treaties among nations. In keeping with the theme of multinational cooperation, liberalism does not allow for the use of force in the self-interest of the nation, but through â€Å"fights for right and good, devoid of raw national interest. † (Krauthammer) This, of course, does not rule out the use of force in self-defense, but in the self-interest of the nation â€Å"shaping the international environment by projecting power abroad to secure economic, political, and strategic goods. (Krauthammer) Such use of force would contradict the tenets of inherently good human nature and multinational cooperation. The second of these theories is realism. Realism looks at the world stage, not as a cooperative international community, but as a series of individual states acting on their own behalf, in the interest of self -preservation. Realism views the international system as a system of anarchy, leading states to depend only upon themselves. In this anarchic system, states have the right to self-preservation, and the system’s stability rests upon a balance of power. While recognizing the participation of international institutions, realism views them as unimportant since the state is the primary agent in the political arena. While individuals may participate in the decision making process of the state, decisions are carried out in a unified manner. Realism believes in the rationalism of man, and argues that â€Å"rational decision-making leads to the pursuit of the national interest. † (Mingst, 64) For realists, state security is a primary concern. The state must protect itself from foreign and domestic enemies, and this is achieved through â€Å"increasing its domestic capacities, building up its economic prowess, and forming alliances with other states based on similar interests. † (Mingst, 64) Realism blames war not on the corruption of social institutions, but the notion that â€Å"humans are basically power seeking and self-absorbed. † (Mingst, 65) Constructivism, the third theory, is a fairly new theory, which has â€Å"returned scholars to the foundational questions, including the nature of the state and the concepts of sovereignty and citizenship. (Mingst, 72) The principles of the theory are not clearly defined, and its qualification as a theory is questioned by some. However, constructivists do agree that the world is too complicated to be summed by one central theory. Constructivists believe that the actions of the state are driven by â€Å"elite beliefs, identities, and social norms†. (Mingst, 72) These factors determine the interests of the state, and these factors are, in turn, subject to change as a result of various influences. In essence, the state is a product of its environment. Constructivists agree with the notion that power is important to the state. However, constructivists have different ideas as to what power is, and strive to find different sources of power. The differences between liberalism and realism are easily defined. Where liberalism views the individual as inherently good, realism views the individual as greedy and egoistic. To liberalism, the state is a functioning member of an international community, in much the same way that an individual is a functioning member of his respective community. Realism on the other hand, sees the state as a power hungry individual in an unstructured international system. While liberalism believes war to be avoidable through education, reformation of social institutions, and shared interests with other nations, realism finds war to be an unavoidable consequence of the self-preservation of the state. Liberalism sees the potential for and desires change, while realism finds change unlikely. Both theories agree on the principle that the international system is anarchic in nature. However, whereas realism relies on a balance of power to keep the system in check, liberalism does so through cooperation of international institutions and mutual interest of various states. In understanding international relations and world events, understanding the theories and principles through which to view these events is a good start. However, it is also important to ask yourself how you intend to use the theory. These theories can be applied to contemporary situations in order to understand the actions and reactions of various parties relevant to a specific issue. The theories can also be used to look at current events and attempt to predict future events. Another use for the theories is to apply them to past events, in an attempt to explain and understand why the events happened, and why various parties, or states, executed certain decisions. For an example of applying theory to a past event, we can look to the Gulf War of 1991. From the historic record, we know that Saddam Hussein ordered Iraqi forces into Kuwait in 1990, and essentially annexed the country. The United Nations responded with various diplomatic options, including trade embargos and economic sanctions, in an attempt to oust the Iraqi military from Kuwait without the use of force. In the end, however, the diplomatic options were exhausted, and in January of 1991, a US-led coalition entered Kuwait and drove the Iraqi military out of the tiny country. With regard to the United States, we can apply the principles of the theory of liberalism to understand the decisions that were made. The US acted in concert with the United Nations, and allowed for the diplomatic options to be exhausted before resorting to military force. This is in keeping with the liberalism principle of avoiding war through the cooperation of international institutions. In the end, when the option of military force was put into play, it was done so with the cooperation and support of a myriad of nations around the world. Additionally, the ultimate use of force can be explained not as an act of aggression on the part of the United States, but as retaliation against the aggressive act of another nation. Therefore, from the standpoint of liberalism, the US can be seen as having used military force not to protect its own interests, but in the interest of the liberty of another nation, with full support and cooperation from the international community. Conversely, while realism does not rely on international institutions, it does recognize the role played by these institutions. Additionally, we know that the US had an interest in the stability of the Middle East due to its reliance on Middle Eastern oil. Therefore, from a realist standpoint, it can be said that the cooperation and support of the international community was simply a favorable outcome for the US, but that the motivation for US military action was actually the defense of its interests in the region. In this case, the US would have been acting purely out of its own interests. In addition, in conjunction with the oil interest, it was in the interest of the US to maintain the balance of power and stability in the Middle East, as well as to protect its strategic allies in the region. Therefore, with Iraq already having invaded one oil producing country, and the threat of an invasion of Saudi Arabia, a major oil producer and regional ally, it was in US national interest to intervene. This is in keeping with the realist line of thinking that man is greedy, and that the state should act in the interest of self-preservation. As we can see, in this application, the liberalist and realist points of view have some common goalsnamely, the liberation of Kuwait. However, the motivations for those goals and the desired end states range from slightly different to completely different. The constructivist standpoint, however, is a little more ambiguous. Constructivists don’t view the international system, anarchic or otherwise, as the driving force behind foreign policy. Rather, policy is driven by the beliefs of the elite and social identity. Our way of life is our social identity. In other words, our social identity, simply put, is oil. Therefore, from the constructivist point of view, intervention on the behalf of Kuwait was a necessary means to protecting our way of life. The constructivist interest, like that of the realist, was oil. However, the reasons for the oil interest are quite different. In conclusion, there are several different ways to interpret various events. One of the methods by which we can attempt to make sense of these events is the use of international relations theory. The three major theories used in this process are liberalism, realism and constructivism. The application of these theories allows us to understand the actions and motivations of various players involved in these events, whether past or present, as well as to predict future events.